🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion say that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families want more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the time for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the right answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.